Archive for February, 2011

Use Awards to Send the Right Message

Equality may be a standard when speaking of opportunities and rights. However, equality has no business in a company rewards program. If every employee gets the same bonus or an identical award, there is no reason to strive for better performance. Participation awards serve their purpose, but they should definitely not be the same as the awards given to employees in recognition of outstanding or record breaking performance.

Competition may be a dirty word to some people, but it remains an essential part of modern business culture. Companies compete for customers and contracts. Employees compete for clients, projects, and promotions. Establishing a clear system of employee awards will inspire many employees to strive for higher and higher standards of performance. They will want to earn the fancy engraved glass awards , not the simple paper certificates.

There is a delicate balance between competition and morale. It is possible for companies to turn awards into something that actually damages morale. Giving out too few awards, having unclear standards for earning them, or giving everyone and anyone an award diminishes the effectiveness of the recognition program. Effective recognition calls attention to those employees that meet high performance standards — or set new standards — and serve as incentives for future performance.

Advantages of EMR Software

Ask almost any doctor today about the one thing that has improved their effectiveness in treating patients in recent years and they are likely to mention the advent of electronic medical records or EMRs. Computerized patient records have completely replaced handwritten records in countless hospitals, clinics, and even private practices. The use of EMR software offers a number of advantages to those facilities that make the conversion

The long standing joke about it being impossible to decipher the handwriting of any doctor will soon be a thing of the past. When all medical charts, prescription orders, and lab forms are entered and transmitted electronically, there’s very little chance of a clerical error or misreading of handwriting leading to malpractice . The number of errors in medication orders can be virtually eliminated as the software can be programmed to catch harmful drug interactions or incorrect dosages that could be fatal.

Efficiency will also increase, though this may be offset in the beginning as doctors and other medical professionals learn to use the new systems. Eventually the time saved in locating, copying, and transferring medical records between departments in a hospital or between lab and doctors office will add up. As older medical records are entered into the electronic system, the amount of physical space required to store records will shrink significantly. Costs associated with copying and shipping records to other facilities will also pretty much disappear.